n<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 1.11 Can You Sell Philology?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.humanismforsale.org/text/archives/104/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.humanismforsale.org/text/archives/104</link>
	<description>Making and Marketing Schoolbooks in Italy, 1450-1650</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 25 Dec 2011 13:41:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Vincler</title>
		<link>http://www.humanismforsale.org/text/archives/104/comment-page-1#comment-75</link>
		<dc:creator>John Vincler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 03:05:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.humanismforsale.org/text/?p=104#comment-75</guid>
		<description>My experience of reading this work is very hypertextual. I find myself bouncing from section to section, revisiting and comparing sections, or even doing searches within the text on phrases I recall or subjects about which I&#039;d like to find more information.  Sometimes questions that are raised at one point in the text seem to be answered later.  I wonder if some additional intertextual footnotes could be added, creating bridges across the text.  While I too was unclear about the use of the term philology here (or was it that I just read the comment and this informed my reading?), this intersection of serious philological concerns and the component parts of basic grammars becomes crystal with the example given in the Erasmus section (2.18, I believe).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My experience of reading this work is very hypertextual. I find myself bouncing from section to section, revisiting and comparing sections, or even doing searches within the text on phrases I recall or subjects about which I&#8217;d like to find more information.  Sometimes questions that are raised at one point in the text seem to be answered later.  I wonder if some additional intertextual footnotes could be added, creating bridges across the text.  While I too was unclear about the use of the term philology here (or was it that I just read the comment and this informed my reading?), this intersection of serious philological concerns and the component parts of basic grammars becomes crystal with the example given in the Erasmus section (2.18, I believe).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dianarobin</title>
		<link>http://www.humanismforsale.org/text/archives/104/comment-page-1#comment-40</link>
		<dc:creator>dianarobin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 22:04:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.humanismforsale.org/text/?p=104#comment-40</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t see that these textbooks --
Latin grammars for school boys --
can be classified as philology, the
advanced study of all aspects of
a language or languages.  What
you are talking about selling is
something much more mechanical
and elementary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t see that these textbooks &#8211;<br />
Latin grammars for school boys &#8211;<br />
can be classified as philology, the<br />
advanced study of all aspects of<br />
a language or languages.  What<br />
you are talking about selling is<br />
something much more mechanical<br />
and elementary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>